Expert Interview with Mercy T. Steenwyk on How High-Stakes Leadership Principles Can Transform Career Performance

Casey Schmalacker

Written by

Casey Schmalacker

8 min read

Expert Interview with Mercy T. Steenwyk on How High-Stakes Leadership Principles Can Transform Career Performance

Mercy T. Steenwyk is the President & CEO of ForensisGroup, the nation’s top expert witness services firm for 35 years. She helps litigators and lawyers find the perfect expert witness when millions of dollars and reputations hang in the balance. In this conversation, we explore how professionals can apply high-stakes decision-making frameworks to career challenges, why executive function systems matter more than natural ability, and how building accountability structures creates sustainable career success.

Q: Mercy, we work with many professionals facing major career transitions who experience decision paralysis because the stakes feel so high. When lawyers come to you in crisis mode needing the perfect expert witness for high-stakes litigation, how do you help them make confident decisions under immense pressure?

Mercy T. Steenwyk: Decision paralysis is something I see constantly. When litigators come to ForensisGroup for expert witness services, whether they need business expert witnesses for intellectual property disputes or engineering expert witnesses for construction defect cases, they’re facing decisions that will affect million-dollar outcomes and their professional reputation. One wrong choice in expert witness consulting can undermine their entire case.

Here’s what I’ve learned from over 30,000 cases: First, I help attorneys distinguish between information-gathering and decision-making. They often want to review every possible expert candidate because more options feel safer, but that creates paralysis. I help them identify the 3-5 critical factors that will determine success in their specific case, and we focus our vetting process there. As part of that process, we also facilitate consultation with experts in related or adjacent disciplines when appropriate, providing a more comprehensive perspective and more robust information to guide our clients in making the best possible decision. Second, I reduce their burden and demands of the decision process by taking ownership of complexity in their search. Our High Touch, High Tech approach means they don’t sift through massive directories. We handle the heavy lifting of finding and vetting expert witnesses so they can focus on case strategy. Third, I build decision confidence through transparency. Lawyers trust our recommendations because we show them exactly how we vetted candidates, what trade-offs exist, and why we believe this expert witness fits their litigation support needs.

Q: Many of our clients struggle with executive function challenges in their professional lives: missing deadlines, feeling overwhelmed by competing priorities, difficulty initiating complex tasks. As someone managing expert witness services across dozens of high-stakes cases simultaneously, what systems have you built to ensure nothing falls through the cracks when lawyers are depending on you?

Mercy T. Steenwyk: In expert witness services, there is zero margin for error. When we’re coordinating multiple cases involving environmental expert witnesses, medical malpractice expert placements, and business expert witnesses for depositions, a missed deadline could destroy a lawyer’s case and our reputation as the nation’s top expert witness services firm. So I don’t rely on memory or natural organizational ability. I’ve built external systems that make executive function failures nearly impossible.

Everything is visually tracked. Every expert witness search, every case milestone, every attorney communication lives on shared project boards with color-coded stages and automated alerts. I use ruthless time-blocking, protecting specific hours for deep strategic work like evaluating complex expert witness matches for high-stakes litigation versus reactive tasks. We break every complex task into immediate next actions. We never assign “find the perfect expert witness.” We assign “acknowledge promptly and, by end of day, identify three candidates meeting technical qualifications.” Finally, accountability is embedded in our team structure with built-in check-ins so no case progresses without oversight. Professional success isn’t about being naturally organized. It’s about building systems that support how your brain actually works.

Q: We frequently work with professionals who feel stuck in their careers, uncertain whether to stay and improve their current situation, seek new opportunities, or pivot entirely. When attorneys come to you with complex litigation that doesn’t fit standard patterns, how do you approach problem-solving, and how might professionals apply that framework to career uncertainty?

Mercy T. Steenwyk: Complex problem-solving is the heart of what ForensisGroup does. When lawyers approach us with challenging litigation support needs that don’t fit templates, we use structured problem analysis that professionals can apply to career confusion.

First, we separate the presenting problem from the actual problem. An attorney might say “I need an engineering expert witness,” but the real need is “I need someone who can simplify technical concepts for a non-technical jury.” When your clients say “I’m unhappy at work,” that’s the symptom. The actual problem might be lack of growth, values misalignment, poor management, or skill underutilization. Second, we map what’s controllable versus what’s contextual. In expert witness services, we can’t control opposing counsel’s strategy, but we can control how thoroughly we vet expert witnesses. Your clients can’t control company culture, but they can control their skill development, boundaries, and job search. Third, we generate multiple solution paths. When providing litigation support, we evaluate several expert candidates with different strengths. Your clients should explore internal improvements, skill development, lateral moves, and external opportunities. Fourth, we test hypotheses before full commitment through preliminary case reviews. Your clients can do informational interviews or take on stretch projects before making major career pivots. Finally, we set decision timelines because deposition schedules don’t wait. Clarity comes from structured inquiry with deadlines, not endless rumination.

Q: We see many high-performing professionals who struggle with emotional regulation in pressure situations: getting defensive in meetings, experiencing presentation anxiety, or shutting down when receiving critical feedback. When lawyers are facing high-stakes litigation with enormous pressure, how do you help them stay calm and focused?

Mercy T. Steenwyk: The lawyers we work with at ForensisGroup are under extraordinary pressure. When they’re handling complex litigation involving millions of dollars, choosing the right expert witness feels like the decision that could make or break their case and their reputation.

I reduce their emotional load by being unshakably reliable. Our Nothing But The Truth® commitment and High Touch High Tech™ approach mean attorneys know we’ve done rigorous vetting, that our expert witness recommendations are sound, and that we’ll stay engaged throughout the litigation support process. Reliability creates emotional space for them to focus on strategy. I also normalize the pressure explicitly: “This decision matters, and it’s normal to feel the weight of it.” Pressure responses are human, not failures. Third, I help them prepare extensively. When attorneys know we’ve thoroughly vetted business expert witnesses, environmental expert witnesses, or medical malpractice experts, their confidence increases exponentially. Preparation is the best emotional regulation tool. Finally, I teach perspective. When an attorney is catastrophizing about expert witness selection, I remind them: “We’ve supported over 30,000 cases. We know what works. Trust the process.” For professionals struggling significantly with emotional regulation in high-stakes situations, working with executive function coaches or performance specialists provides structured skill development that creates lasting behavioral change.

Q: One of our biggest challenges is helping clients maintain accountability and follow-through. Many professionals know what they should be doing but struggle with consistent execution. In an industry where missed deadlines could cost lawyers their cases, how have you built accountability at ForensisGroup that ensures flawless execution?

Mercy T. Steenwyk: At ForensisGroup, we’ve supported over 30,000 high-stakes cases as the nation’s top expert witness services firm, and we cannot afford execution failures. When we commit to finding a vetted expert witness for a lawyer’s case, that deadline is sacred. So accountability isn’t about motivation; it’s structurally embedded in how we work.

First, make goals specific and measurable. “Provide excellent expert witness services” is vague. “Deliver three fully vetted expert candidates within 10 business days” is accountable. Responsiveness and execution timelines are distinct: communications are acknowledged promptly, while deliverables follow clearly defined schedules based on case needs. Your clients need the same specificity. Second, create structural accountability mechanisms. Every expert witness consulting case has visible deadlines, assigned ownership, and scheduled check-ins. Third, attach meaningful consequences. Our Force for Good™ initiative means every completed contract triggers a charitable donation, creating immediate positive reinforcement that our work creates impact beyond business. Help your clients connect daily career actions to their larger purpose. Fourth, reduce friction for desired behaviors. We’ve automated much of our expert witness vetting workflow, so execution doesn’t rely on remembering steps. Fifth, leverage external accountability. Your clients serious about career enhancement should work with career development coaches or join structured programs that provide systematic accountability. The lawyers we serve hire us because we’ve built accountability systems that guarantee execution. Your clients need the same approach to their career development: build systems that make success inevitable, not optional.

ForensisGroup has been the nation’s leading expert witness services firm for 35 years, helping litigators and lawyers find the perfect expert witness when millions of dollars and reputations hang in the balance. Mercy T. Steenwyk’s insights on high-stakes decision-making, executive function, and performance under pressure offer valuable frameworks for professionals navigating career challenges and critical transitions. Learn more at forensisgroup.com.

Casey Schmalacker

Casey Schmalacker

Casey Schmalacker, Vice President at New Frontiers, is a seasoned leader in marketing, sales, and business development. With a dual degree in Government and Law and Economics from Lafayette College, he has spent the past 10 years coaching students, adults, and organizations to improve executive functions, soft skills, and workplace performance. Casey's approach is rooted in strategic development and a passion for personalized coaching, emphasizing a culture of continuous improvement.